Blog

Jev vs. Kev: Two Decision Models, Zero Governance Built In.

Sridhar Ramachandran · CEO & Co-founder · October 2026

TL;DR

  • Evaluate decision quality on your actual task.
  • Account for deployment and document-handling requirements.
  • Govern the workflow independently of the model.

Last week I wrote about Jev, TypeSafe AI's new “decision model.” Not surprisingly, this week there's already an open-source close follower: Kev, built by Jared Palmer on top of Alibaba's Qwen3.5.

Both are the same basic idea, and it's the idea that matters for hallucination: neither model writes free text. Feed either one a document and a set of yes/no or multiple-choice questions, and it returns a calibrated probability for each option. No free text to be generated, hence no hallucination. But that doesn't prevent either model from being confidently wrong.

Comparison card: Jev vs Kev 4B. Confidently wrong (answers at 90%+ confidence that are actually incorrect, out-of-domain): Jev 3.7%, Kev 0.9%. Guesses on the unknowable (answers 90%+ confident when the document can't actually answer it): Jev 9%, Kev 0%. Self-hostable, open weights: Jev no, Kev yes.

Kev's case is that it's open-weight and self-hostable (Apache 2.0), and its builder has been shipping improved checkpoints almost daily. I am sure Jev will keep improving too.

We support both decision models at Cortega, especially in classification use cases, such as legal eDiscovery. Whichever decision model you pick, it still has to run somewhere, under somebody's data policy, with a record of what it saw and what it returned. The agent using the decision model still needs to be secured and governed.

Originally posted on LinkedIn. · Back to all posts

MAKE YOUR NEXT MOVE

Put governance
into practice.

Explore how Cortega fits your AI environment.

Request a demo Learn more Explore the Cortega documentation