Cortega runs inside your infrastructure, not ours, so clinical AI traffic and patient data never touch a system Cortega operates. The architecture is built to support a BAA, with policy, guardrails, and audit evidence built in from the start.
Clinicians and staff already use AI for documentation, coding help, and patient communication. Often there's no approved tool, no BAA, and no IT visibility into any of it.
Technical safeguards that used to be “addressable” are becoming mandatory, including for AI training data and the prediction models moving through your systems.
FDA and CMS guidance increasingly limits opaque, AI-only decisions. Coverage and clinical calls need a real person reviewing and approving them.
Regulators have shifted healthcare AI oversight to a lifecycle model: ongoing monitoring and evidence, rather than a single go-live review.
Cortega runs inside your infrastructure. Patient data and PHI never touch a system Cortega operates, and the architecture is built to support a BAA.
Cortega EdgeSafe finds the ChatGPT tabs, Copilot sessions, and AI scribes staff are already using outside any approved, governed tool.
Local, rule-based detection for PII, payment data (PCI), and healthcare-adjacent patterns like medical license numbers. Enforcement happens before a request completes.
AI-only coverage or clinical decisions get a documented approval decision, with identity and rationale attached, visible in your audit trail.
A hash-chain-verified log of every policy decision, generated continuously as agents operate rather than assembled after the fact for an auditor.
Decide which roles can use which models and MCP tools, so a documentation assistant and a diagnostic-support agent don't share the same permissions.
Tell us what's touching patient data, whether that's clinical documentation, scheduling, an AI scribe, or a diagnostic-support agent, and we'll show you exactly where Cortega fits.